WebJan 19, 2024 · Solution 1. Turn off change tracking before you perform your inserts. This will improve your performance significantly (magnitudes of order). Putting SaveChanges () outside your loop will help as well, but … WebFeb 21, 2024 · For HUGE performance gains, Entity Framework makes one database round-trip for each entity to insert/update/delete. So if you want to save (add, modify or remove) 10,000 entities, 10,000 database round trip will be required which is INSANELY slow. To use BulkSaveChanges, you will need to use a third-party library. Google …
DbContext.SaveChanges Method …
WebNov 19, 2024 · According to Admir's answer, I send every 20 records with one INSERT statement and fortunately ExecuteSqlCommand takes only 6 seconds. BUT SaveChanges () takes about 2 minutes! How can I overcome this problem? c# sql-server entity-framework entity-framework-6 sql-insert Share Follow edited Nov 19, 2024 at 21:40 … WebRemarks. This method will automatically call DetectChanges () to discover any changes to entity instances before saving to the underlying database. This can be disabled via AutoDetectChangesEnabled. Entity Framework Core does not support multiple parallel operations being run on the same DbContext instance. pin web app to taskbar windows 10
Entity framework performance issue, saveChanges is …
WebJun 15, 2024 · You may want to run performance profiler (part of VS) to see which functions are the ones that run slowly. If the saving bit is the problematic one there is also another configuration that you can set _dbContext.Configuration.ValidateOnSaveEnabled = false (it will be validated on SQL side anyway, also if you provide there always correct data … WebOct 5, 2016 · With each change - If you want each save to run in its own transaction and be independent of other changes then run the save in the loop or after you make a change. Note that if there is a failure later in the code then the changes that have already occurred are persisted and will not be rolled back. This also has a higher performance cost as ... WebIf the SaveChanges () call succeeds, get rid of the list. If it fails, log the items. The last option would probably end up being very slow as well, since every single EF object would have to be in memory until SaveChanges () is called. And if the save failed nothing would be committed, right? entity-framework import loops performance savechanges pinweb.com